<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Econ Point of View</title>
    <link>https://econpointofview.com/</link>
    <description>Recent content on Econ Point of View</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://econpointofview.com/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>The Google Lawsuits</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/google-lawsuit/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/google-lawsuit/</guid>
      <description>Truth on the Market is running a symposium on the Google Lawsuits. I contributed a short piece.
I’m skeptical of the claims of anti-competitive behavior:
 If more searchers allow Bing to make a better product, then literally any action (competitive or not) by Google is an externality. Making a better product that takes away consumers from Bing lowers Bing’s quality. That is, strictly speaking, an externality. Surely, that is not worthy of antitrust scrutiny simply because we find an externality.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Reviving Total Demand</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/total-demand/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/total-demand/</guid>
      <description>There is no such thing as supply. There is only demand, or what is sometimes called “total demand”.
When I say total demand, I do not mean the demand of all consumers added together. That would be total consumer demand. I mean TOTAL demand: the demand of all people and not just those economics define as “consumers.” Most authors do not see a difference, because they make the shortcut of dividing the population into producers and consumers.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Econ Point of View Version 2.0!</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/blog-relaunch/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/blog-relaunch/</guid>
      <description>Today marks the relaunch of the Econ Point of View! Let’s recommit to understanding price theory and the economic point of view.
I am reviving this blog as a way to work through new ideas, either for my own research or how I explain topics to students. Because my interests have changed more and more to economic theory, that will be the main focus.
I had been debating blogging again but kept pushing it off because of other commits and my sense that #Econtwitter partly filled the role of a blog: a place to throw out ideas and discuss them.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>&#34;New&#34; Writing Gig at AIER</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/new-writing-gig-at-aier/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/new-writing-gig-at-aier/</guid>
      <description>I&amp;rsquo;m a bit behind on this blog, but I have been writing for the past year or so at the American Institute for Economic Research. I don&amp;rsquo;t know why the let ME write, considering the other people who are contributing, but I&amp;rsquo;ve enjoyed the opportunity. You can find my articles here.
I mostly summarize recent NBER working papers, such as
   When direct records do not exist, researchers must rely on fragmented information and reconstruct the numbers from a variety of sources.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Economics of Constraining Leviathan</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/the-economics-of-constraining-leviathan/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/the-economics-of-constraining-leviathan/</guid>
      <description>While everyone is busy making sense of the election, I figured I would stop on by ye ole blog and talk about something completely unrelated&amp;hellip;
A question I have thought a lot about lately is how can institutions evolve or be designed as to constrain Leviathan. For those of you who forgot your Hobbes, remember, Leviathan is the all-powerful government which people empower so that we can stop killing each other in a state of nature.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Profits under Competition</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/profits-under-competition/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/profits-under-competition/</guid>
      <description>My last post probably generated more confusion than clarity. Let me try to clarify some conceptual points that might help bring my thinking into focus. In that post, I was trying to work through the inequality/rents connection. I argued that the standard way I’ve seen it presented doesn’t make sense to me. I tried to argue that increasing rents is neither necessary, nor sufficient for increasing inequality. In the more speculative parts of the post, I suggested why I think this confusion exists.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Rents vs. Rent-Seeking</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/rents-vs-rent-seeking/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 18:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/rents-vs-rent-seeking/</guid>
      <description>If this post sounds confused, it is probably because it is. I’m trying to work through what people mean when they use the word “rent.” They seem to slide between rents and rent-seeking, which are connected but different things.
Few words in the discussions of inequality are more of a non-sequitur than “rents.” Going back to Ricardo, the word conjures up images of landed aristocracy charging high prices to the poor who work the land.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Emphasis of Economics and Math</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/emphasis-econ-math/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/emphasis-econ-math/</guid>
      <description>Yesterday’s post tried to lay out why I believe the fundamental difference between Austrians, Chicago school, and Samuelsonian economists is only one of emphasis. Thinking more about it, I was reminded about an interview with Kirzner that also bring in the use of math in economics (one of my favorite topics to get myself in trouble).
In an interview for Liberty Fund, Kirzner says the following (54:20):
 If one believes that the description and analysis of equilibrium states constitutes the central task of economic analysis, then the role for mathematics is clear and indisputable because mathematics can and should and is able to grapple with the meaning of an equilibrium state… and to the extent that’s all one has to do, then mathematics would be fine.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Austrians vs. Chicago School vs. Samuelsonians: *Only* a Difference of Emphasis</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/austrians-vs-chicago-vs-samuelsonian/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/austrians-vs-chicago-vs-samuelsonian/</guid>
      <description>A long, long time ago, I had the bold idea to work through three textbooks in economics from three different perspectives: Murray Rothbard’s Man, Economy, and State, George Stigler’s Theory of Price, and Mas-Colell, Whiston, and Green’s _Microeconomic Theory, _or as I separate them: Austrian, Chicago, and Samuelsonian.
Boy, was I naïve then? I also set myself the goal of trying to translate these texts into short blog posts as a way to learn.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Behind First Year: The Numbers</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/the-numbers/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 19:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/the-numbers/</guid>
      <description>(Update: I passed both exams on the first attempt. Hopefully that helps readers to judge the information below.)
Grad students constantly talk about how much they work. It’s a badge of honor to explain how terrible life is. Even I have gotten a little mopey about things lately. I apologize.
This post attempts to put some numbers to the amount of work one specific PhD student did. My purpose is not to brag, neither about how much nor how little I worked, but simply explain how the time I put in.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Models, Who Needs Them?</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/models-who-needs-them/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2015 00:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/models-who-needs-them/</guid>
      <description>There are many books that I’ve read that continue to influence my thinking. An important book for me is “Philosophy: Who Needs It?” by Ayn Rand. This book was important, not because I became a Randian. I didn’t after that book nor “Atlas Shrugged”. Instead, it was the first book I read that urge me to think about philosophy.
Before Rand, I was like most people, scoffing at philosophy, dismissing argument as “just philosophical.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Reply on Austrians and Math</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/reply-on-austrians-and-math/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/reply-on-austrians-and-math/</guid>
      <description>(I apologize to any commentators for the slow response. I just got back from my honeymoon and as much as I love discussing economics with you, it wasn’t my first priority.)
 We should not write so that we can, but that we must, be understood. - Marcus Quintilian  One might think that after 4 years at a good liberal arts college I might be able to write. You’d think I’d be able to make a small point.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Study Math, My Austrian Friends</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/study-math-my-austrian-friends/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/study-math-my-austrian-friends/</guid>
      <description>(Update 8/5/2021: I wrote this during the first year of my PhD. I would no doubt emphasize less about math and more about formal modeling today.)
(Update: I’ve posted a reply to some concerns here.)
Austrian economists hate math. That’s a broad brushstroke, but I stand by it.
And it’s a shame. I understand the Austrian concerns about math and agree with most. But the concerns call for hesitation when applying math to economic problems.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>5 Life Lessons Economics Taught Me</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/5-life-lessons/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/5-life-lessons/</guid>
      <description>Most of the stuff I post is pretty esoteric and nerdy. Only a small group of economists probably like it. I mean me and a random guy in Slovenia. That’s about it.
It’s not a huge problem, since nerdy economic theory is what I enjoy and want to write about. This blog is mostly me talking to myself, so who cares?
However, that’s not enough. Economics is the coolest discipline in the world.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>O Hugo</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/about/_index.pl/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/about/_index.pl/</guid>
      <description>Hugo to statyczny silnik strony napisany w Go.
Korzysta z różnych projektów open source, w tym:
 Cobra Viper J Walter Weatherman Cast  Dowiedz się więcej i wesprzyj na GitHub.
Ustawiać Kilka ciekawych faktów na temat Hugo:
 Wbudowany Go Luźno zainspirowany przez Jekyll Głównie opracowany przez spf13 w pociągu podczas podróży do iz Manhattanu. Zakodowane w Vim przy użyciu spf13-vim  Masz pytania lub sugestie? Zapraszam do otwarcia problemu na GitHub lub zapytaj mnie na Twitterze.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Sobre Hugo</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/about/_index.pt/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/about/_index.pt/</guid>
      <description>Hugo é um gerador de site escrito em Go.
Ele utiliza vários projetos open source, incluindo:
 Cobra Viper J Walter Weatherman Cast  Aprenda mais e contribua no GitHub.
Setup Algumas curiosidades sobre Hugo:
 Feito com Go Loosely inspired by Jekyll Inicialmente desenvolvido by spf13 em um trem enquanto viajava de e para Manhattan. Codificado no Vim usando spf13-vim  Alguma pergunta ou sugestão? Está livre para abrir uma issue no GitHub ou perguntar no Twitter.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>À propos de Hugo</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/about/_index.fr/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/about/_index.fr/</guid>
      <description>Hugo est un moteur de site statique écrit en Go.
Il utilise une variété de projets open source, notamment:
 Cobra Viper J Walter Weatherman Cast  En savoir plus et contribuer sur GitHub.
Installer Quelques faits amusants sur Hugo:
 Construit en Go Librement inspiré par Jekyll Principalement développé par spf13 dans le train lors d&amp;rsquo;un trajet aller-retour pour Manhattan. Codé dans Vim en utilisant spf13-vim  Vous avez des questions ou des suggestions?</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Entrepreneur and the Firm from an Austrian Perspective</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/entrepreneur-and-the-firm-from-an-austrian-perspective/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2014 22:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/entrepreneur-and-the-firm-from-an-austrian-perspective/</guid>
      <description>Firm theory is an awkward field for economists. Firms are inextricably linked to markets but utterly unlike markets. Economists believe they are excellent at explaining how people react to incentives in markets. Economists are not as comfortable analyzing command structures. Firms represent an odd middle ground.
This is why firm structure is a relatively understudied field for economists. Economists can design the most complex auction system that satisfies X,Y,Z.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>I Feel Like I&#39;m Taking Crazy Pills</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/i-feel-like-im-taking-crazy-pills/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/i-feel-like-im-taking-crazy-pills/</guid>
      <description>Economists are strange. Nuts might be a better word. Sometimes I feel like Mugatu taking crazy pills. It is painful to say. Everyone wants to fit in.
I would love to be cool, but not everyone thinks about opportunity costs, diminishing returns, and revealed preference. For some reason, I hear crickets when I talk about this stuff at parties. (Pro tip: Never explain to friends or family that they get paid according to their marginal product.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Two Ways to Paint, or Teach Economics</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/two-ways-to-paint-or-teach-economics/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/two-ways-to-paint-or-teach-economics/</guid>
      <description>Going through MWG, Stigler’s Theory of Price, and Rothbard’s Man, Economy, and State at the same time has brought out many similarities and differences between them about what it means to do economics. More clearly, my process has highlight the differences in teaching economics.
I sound like a broken record, but Rothbard’s process seems fundamentally distinct from either MWG or Stigler, even if his results are not very different early in the books.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>About</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/about/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/about/</guid>
      <description>Economics applies to all aspects of life. It is not simply a school subject, but a way of understanding the world. Through proper economic thinking, people can directly improve their lives and make the world a better place. It simply requires a proper understanding of a few basic ideas.
I sincerely believe in the power of economics and have decided to devote my life to the study and spreading of economic ideas.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Contact</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/contact/_index.fr/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/contact/_index.fr/</guid>
      <description></description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Contato</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/contact/_index.pt/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/contact/_index.pt/</guid>
      <description></description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Kategorie</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/contact/_index.pl/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/contact/_index.pl/</guid>
      <description></description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Kontakt</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/contact/_index.de/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/contact/_index.de/</guid>
      <description></description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>