<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Math on Econ Point of View</title>
    <link>https://econpointofview.com/tags/math/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Math on Econ Point of View</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://econpointofview.com/tags/math/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Austrians vs. Chicago School vs. Samuelsonians: *Only* a Difference of Emphasis</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/austrians-vs-chicago-vs-samuelsonian/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/austrians-vs-chicago-vs-samuelsonian/</guid>
      <description>A long, long time ago, I had the bold idea to work through three textbooks in economics from three different perspectives: Murray Rothbard’s Man, Economy, and State, George Stigler’s Theory of Price, and Mas-Colell, Whiston, and Green’s _Microeconomic Theory, _or as I separate them: Austrian, Chicago, and Samuelsonian.
Boy, was I naïve then? I also set myself the goal of trying to translate these texts into short blog posts as a way to learn.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Reply on Austrians and Math</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/reply-on-austrians-and-math/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/reply-on-austrians-and-math/</guid>
      <description>(I apologize to any commentators for the slow response. I just got back from my honeymoon and as much as I love discussing economics with you, it wasn’t my first priority.)
 We should not write so that we can, but that we must, be understood. - Marcus Quintilian  One might think that after 4 years at a good liberal arts college I might be able to write. You’d think I’d be able to make a small point.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Study Math, My Austrian Friends</title>
      <link>https://econpointofview.com/blog/study-math-my-austrian-friends/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://econpointofview.com/blog/study-math-my-austrian-friends/</guid>
      <description>(Update 8/5/2021: I wrote this during the first year of my PhD. I would no doubt emphasize less about math and more about formal modeling today.)
(Update: I’ve posted a reply to some concerns here.)
Austrian economists hate math. That’s a broad brushstroke, but I stand by it.
And it’s a shame. I understand the Austrian concerns about math and agree with most. But the concerns call for hesitation when applying math to economic problems.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>